Jump to content

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Shortcuts: COM:ANV • COM:AVI • COM:AIV

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section]
User problems
[new section]
Blocks and protections
[new section]
Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

To create a report please click on the button above and fill the fields. Alternatively you may copy the following template, replacing USER/IP and REASON with your content, and place it at the bottom of this page:

{{subst:Report vandal|USER/IP|REASON. ~~~~}}

64.114.223.117

[edit]
✓ Done. 2 days block. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Glunz Ocean Beach Hotel & Resort

[edit]

User: Glunz Ocean Beach Hotel & Resort (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Vandalism. crosswiki spam and sockpuppetry XReport --  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I realize these were uploaded with advertising intent (although, really, there was nothing explicitly promotional in the descriptions) and that a business name should not be on an account without verification, but if the licenses are OK, then File:The Birth of Glunz Ocean Beach Hotel & Resort.jpg, File:Glunz Ocean Beach Hotel & Resort Beach.jpg, and File:Glunz Ocean Beach Hotel & Resort Villa's.jpg do not strike me as being clearly out of scope. - Jmabel ! talk 01:20, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Inappropriate username. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rakibkhanomi042

[edit]

User: Rakibkhanomi042 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Vandalism. Block evading sockpuppet. see uploads XReport --All the Best -- Chuck Talk 14:58, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Bedivere (talk) 15:10, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Djeidudj

[edit]

User: Djeidudj (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Indiscriminately nominating sexual files, including historical fine art, with identical nonsense rationales Dronebogus (talk) 15:06, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done @Dronebogus: user warned. You could have done that yourself. - Jmabel ! talk 19:21, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: I reported it mainly because I would like an admin to speedy close all their requests as frivolous and disruptive, unless there’s a general-use automated closure gadget you can point me to. Dronebogus (talk) 00:05, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also as the user has been nothing but hugely disruptive with zero useful edits I think they should just be blocked as w:wp:NOTHERE before they do more damage. Dronebogus (talk) 00:10, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Working my way through these. So far the only one I'm not speedy-keeping is Commons:Deletion requests/File:The external genitalia of an unaroused Indian male (Right view).jpg. I might well have voted "delete" on that myself (but won't). I leave it to someone else to decide if it merits a speedy keep. - Jmabel ! talk 04:50, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not speedy-keeping File:Peyronies side.jpg (similarly). - Jmabel ! talk 04:52, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto for several apparent porn videos—File:Gay Anal Sex in Lingerie and Stockings.webm, File:Doggy style sex close up.webm, File:Doggy style sex close up.webm, File:Missionary sex position video.webm—which I am not watching to determine its status, someone else can do that. - Jmabel ! talk 05:11, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

陳宏祥

[edit]

User: 陳宏祥 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Continue to upload personal and copyvio photo after final warning. The user was blocked on zhwiki due to spam-only account.
SCP-2000 15:29, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done by Yann. Kadı Message 10:15, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Turkishball2010

[edit]

User: Turkishball2010 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Reverting files with no good reason SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 15:52, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"No good reason" sure seems to be the case. Often flipping them around and going back to what they were, almost never with clear rationales. Not a very prolific user, so I think we can take time to allow them to explain themselves, if there is an explanation.
@Turkishball2010: , I'd say you are in serious danger of being blocked here. Can you explain what you were up to on File:Fictional flag of the Mughal Empire (2).svg, File:Safavid Flag.svg and File:Flag of Indonesia and Sweden.svg? In particular, on that last, why were you accusing User:VulpesVulpes42 of vandalism? - Jmabel ! talk 19:32, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SpecialNeedsRetard

[edit]

User: SpecialNeedsRetard (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Inappropriate username. Vandalism only account. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:04, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
+1 Needs indefinite block. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 21:11, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Account name alone is enough for an indef block, which I will do. - Jmabel ! talk 05:14, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I look at their contributions and apparently, they are ableist (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ada_Mee&diff=prev&oldid=1286624132) and I don’t know if they are influenced by ideology or something but either way, this user needs also needs to be investigated by the police too (what you are witnessing is known as cybermooning). We need to keep an eye out because he or she might come back under a different account. Wikimedia needs to make a statement because ableism can happen anytime and this is worrying. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 21:25, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speaking as an autistic person, Wikimedia actions are more important than statements, although I do acknowledge that statements against ableism are appreciated. And I've definitely been the receiving end of the particular slur in the user's name. Unfortunately, I doubt the user will reflect on how hurtful things like that are. Abzeronow (talk) 21:36, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
According to en-wiki, Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. - Jmabel ! talk 02:20, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

49.228.176.89

[edit]
@GPSLeo: Thanks!   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:37, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I did not look here but I also saw the nonsense reports at Commons talk:Abuse filter. GPSLeo (talk) 10:41, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Saquon

[edit]

User: Saquon (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Uploading stock photo copyvios after a final warning, no other contributions. Belbury (talk) 17:29, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury, ✓ Done Kadı Message 17:36, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Аԁѡоӏғ Һіҭӏєя

[edit]

User: Аԁѡоӏғ Һіҭӏєя (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Vandalism XReport --MathXplore (talk) 23:57, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Already globally locked. - Jmabel ! talk 02:21, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decide4Action

[edit]

User: Decide4Action (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: spam only account, has been warned Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:24, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:13, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ありがとうの花

[edit]

User: ありがとうの花 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Cross-wiki abuse LTA. Sakurase (talk) 15:14, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment User has been indefed on enwiki, I'm reporting to SRG. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for helping! Sakurase (talk) 17:36, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Alachuckthebuck: SRG? - Jmabel ! talk 19:56, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: Meta:Steward requests/Global. Chuck is reporting them there so they get globally locked. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:03, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@The Squirrel Conspiracy, 100% correct, thanks for clarifying for me! All the Best -- Chuck Talk 20:08, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Will add to COM:Glossary, a new one to me. - Jmabel ! talk 23:38, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
COM:Glossary is, itself, a new one to me. Super useful. Thanks! The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:17, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@The Squirrel Conspiracy: thanks, I wrote about a third of it, mostly by adding things whenever they come up and are new to me. - Jmabel ! talk 04:08, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArtopiaBoy

[edit]

User: ArtopiaBoy (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: DR vandalism, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:MAN SLT-70 Mammut.jpg. Also suspected IP socking in Commons:Deletion requests/File:LegoCustomMinifigures.jpg. Tvpuppy (talk) 12:51, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tvpuppy, is there a reason the "DR" wasn't reverted? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:07, 6 May 2025 (UTC) striking becasue it's a technically impossible revert to do. [reply]
 Comment I've tagged the page for speedy deletion under rationale COM1 (improper DR). All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:08, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]